咨询Primus MicronStove Ti2.5这款炉头实用效果
http://www.snowbird.com.cn/sport/primus/sucha/image/micronstove%20ti.jpg69克迷你气炉
今年，PRIMUS开发了一款超轻的迷你炉头,以满足那些使用“克”来计算背包重量的前卫玩家。它主要采用了钛和铝做为材料，重量低至69克（2.5盎司）。毫无疑问，我们新款的MicroStove Ti2.5是世界上最轻的炉具。配有尼龙存放贷。
性能参数
重量：69克-2.5盎司
体积：66x42x66毫米
功率：2200 瓦 – 7500 BTU/小时
点火：手动点火
烧开水：4分钟
适用：1-2人
我在网上搜了一圈，没找到它收纳以后的图片，我想知道他的支架是如何撑开的？也想知道实际的使用效果如何。
为了自制吊炉，我还选中了Karrimor的101、103、109，这三款炉头又如何？ 支持一个，马贼有这个炉子，你借来看看实物不就得了
另外马贼有个帖子介绍这个的，看到了么 搜了一下，只有这个马贼的回复，还是不够，我想看它收纳以后的样子：
=============
功率这事情，不完全做的数的。
就我自己感觉，P家标的比较实在，SP的最不实在，B/O用的不多，不好说
从汽灯的角度看，标称70w的Primus Micron lantern远亮于80W的SP天灯，炉子也是。
Flex/Crux我不喜欢的主要原因是总感觉不稳，Crux的支撑面积太小，而Flex四腿支撑也不如三腿支撑稳定
综合来说我选择Ti 2.5，轻，稳定，火力足够大。 3个爪是斜着朝下掰,体积就是没有爪子的那么大小 http://www.gearer.net/viewthread.php?tid=4872&highlight=%EE%D1%BB%F0 俺关注这款炉子很久了，哪位达人能把这款炉子和Optimus Crux对比一下？？ [转自MEC.CA]
Don't buy this
By Kathleen from Toronto on 7/24/2007
Pros:Compact, Excellent Power, Lightweight
Cons:Low Quality, Not durable
Best Uses:Camping, Picnicing
Bottom Line:No, I would not recommend this to a friend
I bought 1 of these little stoves. It is small and lightweight and has amazing power. It worked wonderfully until I tried to collapse 1 of the 3 grids (only after a few uses) and one of the grids broke off. It was replaced by [...] since they could easily see that it had a welding problem with the grid. I loved the little stove so much I bought another one that same day. Off I went this year just 3 times with my two little stoves. And again on 1 of them a grid broke off. I am not a strong woman. I am careful with my things. But, these grid (arms) break off so easily when collapsing them. On the 3rd, and my last stove, I dared not close it for fear that the arm would break and I would be left in the wilderness with nothing (not yet Survivor Woman :). So I have had the same problem with 2 out of 3 of these little guys. Amazing power but they don't stay together. I am off to [...] to ask them to collapse the grids of the 3rd and final stove themselves, to show them the problem first hand. I hope to find a better replacement -)
简单的说就是架锅的架子容易断 应该是个体问题吧。这个我也用了不少时间了，没那么容易坏的 贼兄用东西比较细致吧：）
原帖由 <i>天山马贼</i> 于 2007-8-28 23:52 发表<br />
应该是个体问题吧。这个我也用了不少时间了，没那么容易坏的 <br /> 搜到三篇国外的评测：
http://www.backpackgeartest.org/reviews/Cook%20Gear/Stoves/Primus%20Micron%20Ti%2025%20Stove/Test%20Report%20by%20Curt%20Peterson/
http://www.backpackgeartest.org/reviews/Cook%20Gear/Stoves/Primus%20Micron%20Ti%2025%20Stove/Test%20Report%20by%20Michael%20Wheiler/
http://www.backpackgeartest.org/reviews/Cook%20Gear/Stoves/Primus%20Micron%20Ti%2025%20Stove/Test%20Report%20by%20Rick%20Allnutt/
都是夸奖的，看看图片就可以了：）
看文章的过程中，发现了一个感兴趣的玩意，应该是气炉烤架，有谁用过？效果如何？哪里可以搞到？
http://www.backpackgeartest.org/reviews/Cook%20Gear/Stoves/Primus%20Micron%20Ti%2025%20Stove/Test%20Report%20by%20Michael%20Wheiler/tn_P1010164.JPG
如果下层材料就是一普通金属板，我想还有DIY的可能：）
还有这个锅的外层好像还包裹了一层褶皱的铝箔，边上还有盖，这又有何作用？保温？
http://www.backpackgeartest.org/reviews/Cook%20Gear/Stoves/Primus%20Micron%20Ti%2025%20Stove/Test%20Report%20by%20Rick%20Allnutt/micron3.jpg 烤架看起来太不稳了 这个烤架我很早就有了,GSI的。
底下是一层金属网，起到热量均匀分布的作用。
稳定性尚好。
烤吐司作三明治效果一流 马贼另起一帖介绍一下GSI烤架吧，看上去不错唉～
页:
[1]