原帖由 <i>eva8971</i> 于 2010-10-21 01:35 发表 <a href="http://www.gearer.info/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=195369&ptid=12032" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.gearer.info/bbs/images/common/back.gif" border="0" onload="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.alt='Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out';}" onmouseover="if(this.width>screen.width*0.7) {this.resized=true; this.width=screen.width*0.7; this.style.cursor='hand'; this.alt='Click here to open new window\nCTRL+Mouse wheel to zoom in/out';}" onclick="if(!this.resized) {return true;} else {window.open(this.src);}" onmousewheel="return imgzoom(this);" alt="" /></a><br />
484因为软壳面料挺括,如果带个帽子的话,会妨碍你左右扭头的视线 ?
moonstone Nordwand 是有个藏在领子里的薄帽子, 不过是抓绒的, 应该不防水, 没有见过很详细的说明, 以官方规格为准<br /><br />网摘一篇<br />Do you suppose soft shell should have a hood?<br />If not, and you're an outdoor activist, then it isn't soft shell. If it doesn't have a hood, as soon as it starts to rain or snow you'll be reaching for your shell, therefore, it isn't doing what a soft shell should. Just take a look at those fancy 'soft shell' jackets that feature water-resistant zippers and no hood? What's the point? To stop wind, I don't think so, no it's to give that top end look without that top end performance a hood would give. Why no hood? Well hoods are a waste of space when you're playing golf, sitting in your Mondeo on the M25, or wearing it under your Barber jacket. Sure a hood adds bulk and makes it harder to make a nice 'smart' collar design but this is soft shell, not soft as shite, it's designed to do the job as a fully working shell.